The Economist is concerned about the present state of affairs, as they should be:
Although in public China’s leaders eschew triumphalism, there is a sense in Beijing that the reassertion of the Middle Kingdom’s global ascendancy is at hand.
I love The Economist and really miss reading the print copy every week (budget just can’t support that habit right now). However, I’m tending to agree with some of the comments on Strange Maps site. Perhaps a better title for the graphic (if not the article) would have been “How China Sees the West”. I certainly would have at least stuck a skyscraper at Vancouver, BC (Canada), but they didn’t ask me.
Already a big idea has spread far beyond China: that geopolitics is now a bipolar affair, with America and China the only two that matter. Thus in London next month the real business will not be the G20 meeting but the “G2” summit between Presidents Barack Obama and Hu Jintao.
There is alot about China I don’t pretend to understand. Although I think The Economist may be oversimplifying their graphic design, their ultimate point is well to consider.
Far from oozing self-confidence, China is witnessing a fierce debate both about its economic system and the sort of great power it wants to be—and it is a debate the government does not like. This year the regime curtailed even the perfunctory annual meeting of its parliament, the National People’s Congress (NPC), preferring to confine discussion to back-rooms and obscure internet forums. Liberals calling for greater openness are being dealt with in the time-honoured repressive fashion. But China’s leaders also face rumblings of discontent from leftist nationalists, who see the downturn as a chance to halt market-oriented reforms at home, and for China to assert itself more stridently abroad…
Wikipedia lists about 60 cities in China with a population of over 1,000,000 people—that’s urbanized population, administrative population (similar to our metropolitan areas?) is much larger. Can you name more than 2?
I’m not sure I can.